Some Islamic scholars consider dogs to be ritually impure (najis), which influences their rulings on whether keeping or interacting with dogs is permissible (halal) or forbidden (haram). This view stems primarily from interpretations of certain hadith (sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad). One common interpretation centers on hadith that describe angels not entering a house where a dog is present. Angels are considered benevolent spiritual beings, and their absence implies a lack of divine blessing or presence. This absence is interpreted as a negative consequence of having a dog indoors. Furthermore, some hadith mention the necessity of washing utensils that have been licked by a dog a specific number of times, including once with dirt. This practice is seen as an indication of the dog’s impurity and the need for rigorous cleansing to remove traces of it. The specificity of the washing ritual, including the use of dirt, suggests a particular type of impurity not found with other animals. It’s important to note that not all scholars agree on the absolute prohibition of dogs. Some differentiate between dogs kept for specific purposes, such as guarding livestock, hunting, or farming, and those kept solely as pets. They argue that the hadith should be understood in context and that dogs serving a useful purpose are exempt from the general aversion. This view often allows for keeping working dogs while maintaining cleanliness and avoiding unnecessary contact. The concept of ritual purity (taharah) is central to Islamic practice, affecting prayer, worship, and other religious observances. If a dog is considered ritually impure, contact with it might necessitate purification rituals before engaging in prayer or other acts of worship. This perceived hindrance to religious practice contributes to the discouragement of keeping dogs by some scholars. However, some scholars argue that the interpretation of “najis” should not be understood as physically unclean, but rather as spiritually undesirable. They emphasize the importance of kindness and compassion towards animals, referencing hadith that speak positively of treating animals well. They argue that avoiding unnecessary contact and maintaining cleanliness is sufficient, without necessarily deeming the dog inherently evil or forbidden. The differing interpretations of hadith and the nuances of Islamic jurisprudence lead to a spectrum of opinions on the permissibility of keeping dogs. Some scholars strictly forbid it, citing concerns about ritual purity and the absence of angels. Others permit it for specific purposes, emphasizing the importance of cleanliness and hygiene. Still others adopt a more lenient view, focusing on kindness to animals and differentiating between working dogs and pets. Ultimately, individual Muslims often consult with religious scholars and follow the rulings that resonate most strongly with their understanding of Islamic teachings.
Leave a Reply